Board membership decision tree
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| DRAFT |
According to our Statutes we have the following matrix on how we can handle Board member membership:
| Initiative | Possibilities in grade of severity | Legal base | Decision/Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activity organisers | Revoke from activities | Friendly space policy | Can attend other activities |
| Personal decision | Activities as volunteer | WMF | Only personal |
| Activities as associate member | Statutes | ||
| Activities as effective member | |||
| Reduce ones actvities as board member | Common agreement | ||
| Leave the Board on own initiative | Only personal | ||
| Do not decide | Proposal by the board for disciplinary actions | ||
| Board | Do nothing | Statutes | 1/2 Board meeting |
| Continue only as treasurer | Board can delegate a technical function | ||
| Decision to propose to suspend as a board member | 1/2 Board meeting | ||
| Proposal for disciplinary actions | |||
| Board or 10% of effective members | Organise Extraordinary general assembly | ||
| Board or 5% of effective members | Decision to suspend as a board member | Statutes | 2/3 Extraordinary general assembly |
| Apply disciplinary actions | |||
| Revoke as board member with/without option as new future candidate | |||
| Revoke as effectieve or associate member | |||
| Trust and Safety team | Suspend as volunteer | WMF | Described on Meta |
| Revoke as volunteer | |||
Risk matrix[edit]
The above decisions all have a responsibility or risk towards:
| Board | Members | Projects | Partners | Reputation | Affiliates | WMF | General Public |
|---|