Board membership decision tree
Appearance
DRAFT |
According to our Statutes we have the following matrix on how we can handle Board member membership:
Initiative | Possibilities in grade of severity | Legal base | Decision/Consequence |
---|---|---|---|
Activity organisers | Revoke from activities | Friendly space policy | Can attend other activities |
Personal decision | Activities as volunteer | WMF | Only personal |
Activities as associate member | Statutes | ||
Activities as effective member | |||
Reduce ones actvities as board member | Common agreement | ||
Leave the Board on own initiative | Only personal | ||
Do not decide | Proposal by the board for disciplinary actions | ||
Board | Do nothing | Statutes | 1/2 Board meeting |
Continue only as treasurer | Board can delegate a technical function | ||
Decision to propose to suspend as a board member | 1/2 Board meeting | ||
Proposal for disciplinary actions | |||
Board or 10% of effective members | Organise Extraordinary general assembly | ||
Board or 5% of effective members | Decision to suspend as a board member | Statutes | 2/3 Extraordinary general assembly |
Apply disciplinary actions | |||
Revoke as board member with/without option as new future candidate | |||
Revoke as effectieve or associate member | |||
Trust and Safety team | Suspend as volunteer | WMF | Described on Meta |
Revoke as volunteer |
Risk matrix
[edit]The above decisions all have a responsibility or risk towards:
Board | Members | Projects | Partners | Reputation | Affiliates | WMF | General Public |
---|