Board membership decision tree

DRAFT

According to our Statutes we have the following matrix on how we can handle Board member membership:

Initiative	Possibilities in grade of severity	Legal base	Decision/Consequence
Activity organisers	Revoke from activities	Friendly space policy	Can attend other activities
Personal decision	Activities as volunteer	WMF	Only personal
Personal decision	Activities as associate member	Statutes	Only personal
Personal decision	Activities as effective member	Statutes	Only personal
Personal decision	Reduce ones actvities as board member	Statutes	Common agreement
Personal decision	Leave the Board on own initiative	Statutes	Only personal
Personal decision	Do not decide	Statutes	Proposal by the board for disciplinary actions
Board	Do nothing	Statutes	1/2 Board meeting
Board	Continue only as treasurer	Statutes	Board can delegate a technical function
Board	Decide to suspend as board member	Statutes	1/2 Board meeting
Board	Proposal for disciplinary actions	Statutes	1/2 Board meeting
Board or 10% of effective members	Organise Extraordinary general assembly	Statutes	1/2 Board meeting
Board or 5% of effective members	Apply disciplinary actions	Statutes	2/3 Extraordinary general assembly
Board or 5% of effective members	Revoke as board member with/without option as new future candidate	Statutes	2/3 Extraordinary general assembly
Board or 5% of effective members	Revoke as effectieve or associate member	Statutes	2/3 Extraordinary general assembly
T&S	Suspend as volunteer	WMF	Described on Meta
T&S	Revoke as volunteer	WMF	Described on Meta

Risk matrix

The above decisions all have a responsibility or risk towards:

Board	Members	Projects	Partners	Reputation	Affiliates	WMF	General Public